Politics

National

International

Latest Updates

Showing posts with label POLITICS. Show all posts
Showing posts with label POLITICS. Show all posts

‘Hopeless’ Congress shamelessly joined voice for ‘Kashmir azadi’: PM Modi

October 29, 2017


Speaking at Dashamah Soundarya Lahari Parayanotsava Mahasarmapane in Bengaluru on Sunday, 29 October, Prime Minister Narendra Modi questioned Congress’ stand on the issue of Jammu and Kashmir.

Senior Congress leader P Chidambaram’s remark that “when people in Jammu and Kashmir ask for ‘azadi’, they seek autonomy” hasn’t gone down well with the BJP.

Referring to his statement, the Prime Minister asked why the Congress leaders are lending their voices to those who want ‘azadi’ in Kashmir.

He said that the statement made by the Congress leader on Saturday, 28 October, clearly showed how the party felt about surgical strikes and the bravery of the army.

The Congress, which was in power until recently, took a U-turn on matters of national interest, Modi said, adding that the party would have to answer for its leader’s comments.

“It seemed that after repeated defeats, the wise leaders in Congress would try and bring the party on the right track, but they are still acting irresponsibly,” the PM said, adding that it doesn’t seem like the party wants to learn from its mistakes.

Inspired by CM Nitish Kumar, Bihar couple had a dowry free marriage

October 29, 2017


Not many newlyweds get a certificate of appreciation from their state’s chief minister soon after they get married.

But on Saturday, Prakash Kumar Sah and Puja Kumari, natives of villages in Bihar’s Bhojpur district, got one from Chief Minister Nitish Kumar at his residence in Patna, and received his blessing.

Why? Prakash hadn’t asked for a dowry. And by his own admission, his inspiration was a campaign Nitish launched earlier this month to combat the practice, which has been illegal in India since 1961.
The campaign, which began on Gandhi Jayanthi, also combats child marriage.

It isn’t the first time Nitish Kumar has personally expressed appreciation for someone who’s contributed to the eradication of dowry.

Earlier this month, he called up and congratulated a former headmaster from Bhojpur who returned a dowry of Rs. 4 lakh to his future daughter-in-law’s family.

Did demonetization note ban increase Income Tax Returns?

October 20, 2017


In a press release dated 7 August 2017, the Central Board of Direct Taxes (CBDT) claimed that there has been a ‘substantial increase’ in the number of tax returns filed this year (1 April – 5 August 2017) on account of demonetisation.

These first sentences from the CBDT press release are important and we will put them under a microscopic scrutiny in the next few paragraphs.

CBDTAs a result of demonetisation and Operation Clean Money, there is a substantial increase in the number of Income Tax Returns (ITRs) filed. The number of Returns filed as on 5 August 2017 stands at 2,82,92,955 (approx. 2.83 crore) as against 2,26,97,843 (approx. 2.27 crore) filed during the corresponding period of FY 2016-2017, registering an increase of 24.7% compared to growth rate of 9.9% in 2016.

Where is the Clear Jump?



–  In 2015, the due date for filing tax returns was extended from 31 July to 7 September.

– ITR wise break-up of tax returns filed is available for 1.84 crore tax returns filed between 1 April – 31 August 2015. Between 1-7 September 2015, approximately 22 lakh tax returns were filed, for which ITR wise break up is not available.

The above figures reveal that for the period 1 April – 31 August 2016, the number of e-returns filed were 2.56 crores. This is a 24.3 percent jump from the number of tax returns e-filed for the same period previous year i.e. 1 April – 31 August 2015.

However, in FY 15-16, the due date for filing tax returns was extended till 7 September 2015. So to make the data comparable, we have considered the tax returns filed up to 7 September 2015 which is 2.06 crores.

So the first question that arises is – when there was a clear 24 percent jump in the number of tax returns filed between April – August 2016, is the government right in claiming that there has been a substantial rise in 2017?

In fact, in 2015 (Apr – Aug), there was a 30 percent increase in number of returns filed as compared to 2014. The percentage rise this year in number of tax returns filed is 25 percent for the period 1 April – 5 August 2017 vs 1 April –  5 August 2016.

While the comparative period we have taken for FYs 2012-16 is April – August, in 2017, we have data only up to 5 August. But it may not be out of place to assume that on 31 August 2017, the number of returns filed will still be 25 percent more than those filed in 2016.

ITRs From Independent Assesses Increased Over Time

Now lets dig even deeper into the statistics and take out from the calculations all the tax returns filed up to 31 August, but whose due date falls on 30 September.  All Corporate assesses and those non-corporate taxpayers, whose receipts are above Rs 1 crore, have to get their accounts audited (tax audit ) and file income-tax returns by 30- 30 September.

For a moment, let us consider only those returns whose due-date falls on 31 July (all individual assessees (mainly salaried class) and non-corporate assessees whose receipts are below Rs. 1 crore). In this case, ITR 4, 5 & 6 which have filed from April 1 – August 31st, shall be excluded from the data. Now, in 2015, since the 31 July due date was extended till 7 September, we need to consider the ITR wise data as of 7 September 2015.

Unfortunately, the ITR wise data is available only as on 31 August 2015. Between 31 August and 7 September 2015 around 22 lakh tax returns in all were filed, but their ITR wise break up is not available. From April – August 2015, 1.84 crore tax returns were filed of which 16.4% returns were ITR 4, 5 & 6. Let us assume that of the 22 lakh returns filed between September 1 & 7, 2015, only 3
lakh (13.6%) were tax audit ones, i.e. ITR 4,5 & 6. Even after eliminating ITR 4, 5 & 6 from both 2015 and 2016, what we get is as follows :

Tax returns filed between 1 April – 7 September 2015 = 1.73 crores (2.06 crores tax returns – 33 lakhs ITR 4,5,6 )

Tax returns filed between 1 April – 31 August 2016 = 2.12 crores (2.57 crores tax returns – 45 lakhs ITR 4,5, 6).

Even eliminating ITRs 4, 5 & 6 from the equation still shows 22.5 percent growth in tax returns in 2016 vs 2015, for the relevant period April to August. This compares favorably to the 25 percent growth in tax returns this year as per the CBDT press release.

Whichever way you calculate, the 25 percent growth in tax returns for the current year, is not “substantially” higher than in 2016. In fact it is almost the same growth percentage. One caveat – we do not have ITR wise break-up for current year since it has not yet been released by CBDT but any permutation and combination is unlikely to change the growth percentages radically.

Increase in ITRs For 2017 and 2016 Calculated on Different Baselines

The second statistical assertion in the CBDT press release is also inaccurate. The CBDT claims in its press release of 7 August 2017 that the rise in percentage of tax returns this year is 25%, whereas for the same period in 2016, the percentage rise was only 9.9 percent. This is absolutely incorrect.

The CBDT has taken two completely different baselines for comparison. It has calculated the 9.9 percent increase figure based on the number of tax returns filed between 1 April – 5 August 2016, vs the number of tax returns filed between 1 April – 7 September 2015. Sure, the due date in 2015 was extended to 7 September, so rather the CBDT should have compared the number of returns filed between 1 April – 31 August 2016 vs 1 April – 7 September 2015.

That would produce comparable results for statistical analysis… and what does it show? A 24 percent rise in tax returns in 2016 vs 2015 and not 9.9 percent, as the 7 August press release of CBDT seeks to present. And as we have shown in the above para, in case we were to eliminate all the ITRs 4, 5 & 6 which were filed between April 1 and August 31 from both 2015 and 2016 data, we still get a 22 percentage increase in returns filed.

To prove our above point, we need to look no further than the CBDT’s own press release issued last year on 8 August 2016. These are sentences culled out as is from that press release.

CBDTAs on 5th August 2016, over 226.98 Lakh e-returns had been filed in F.Y. 2016-17 as compared to 70.97 Lakh for the same period in FY 2015-16. The growth is over 9.8 percent even if comparison is made with E-returns filed of 206.55 Lakh as on 7th September 2015 (the extended due date in FY 2015-16) which is for a period more than a month later.

The CBDT itself in its press release last year admitted that the periods are not comparable.

Thankfully, the CBDT did not compare the no. of returns filed between 1 April – 5 August for both 2015 and 2016. Had they done that, not only would it be incomparable (since due date in 2015 was extended till 7 September), but would have shown a 200% rise in no. of tax returns filed in 2016!
That would have been muddled the picture even more.

Effect of demonetisation on Personal Income Tax?

Now lets turn to another claim in the press release.

CBDTThe effect of demonetisation is also clearly visible in the growth in Direct Tax Collections. Advance Tax collections of Personal Income Tax (i.e. other than Corporate Tax) as on 05.08.2017 showed a growth of about 41.79 percent over the corresponding period in F.Y. 2016-2017. Personal Income Tax under Self Assessment Tax (SAT) grew at 34.25 percent over the corresponding period in F.Y. 2016- 2017.

This one is a little more difficult to prove/disprove, for a simple reason that there isn’t comparable data available on the personal advance tax collections for April – 5 August 2016 or even for Q1 of 2016-17. At least we couldn’t find. But there is data available on personal income tax collections (self-assessment tax) for 2016, albeit for the period April – June 30, 2016.

The CBDT press release dated 8 July 2016 shows even last year in Q1, the gross personal income tax collection growth was around 30% while the growth in net collection (after adjusting for refunds) was 48.75%. So a 34.2% increase in personal tax collections this year, is par for the course and in line with the previous year’s growth percentages.

What adds to the confusion though is another press release issued by the CBDT (9 August), pertaining to tax collections for the period 1 April – 31 July 2017. As per the latest press release there has been only a 17.5% growth in gross personal tax collections between April – July this year.  Whereas, the CBDT press release issued couple of days ago, (7 August) states that there has been a 34% growth in personal tax collections between 1 April and 5 August 2017. It seems the last 5 days before the due date for filing returns, i.e. 5 August produced a windfall for the Revenue.

CBDT Should Have Patted Its Own Back

Now to a point which is highly arguable. But this is actually to the credit of tax department. Rather than giving oversized credit to the 8 November demonetisation for the increase in tax collections, the CBDT ought to have patted its own back for their relentless pursuit of tax evaders. In July 2016 (4 months before demonetisation), while the Income Declaration Scheme (IDS) was still on, the CBDT first sent an internal memo to its Officers and then followed it up with a high impact press statement/release, that essentially upped the ante on those evading taxes. The crux of the July 2016 CBDT statement/internal directive :

CBDT, vide an internal communication dated 5 July 2016, directed the Income tax Chief Commissioners to monitor 60 lakh high value financial transactions without PAN (info obtained by IT Dept. via AIR, i.e. Annual Information return that is filed by banks & financial instructions ).
On 21 July 2016 the CBDT issued a press release under the heading – “IT Dept. to issue 7 lakh letters seeking information in respect of High Value Transactions.”  The operative part of the press release reads thus – “ The Income Tax Department has with the help of in-house computer techniques, grouped such non-PAN transactions and identified 7 lakh high-risk clusters having around 14 lakh non-PAN transactions which are being scrutinized by the Income Tax Department closely. The Department will be issuing letters to the parties of these transactions requesting them to provide their PAN number against these transactions.”

Over the last couple of years, the CBDT has been making big time use of data analytics, which it claims, has helped the IRS to compile a list of “non-filers” of income-tax returns. As per the CBDT’s Central Action Plan (its comprehensive annual strategy document) the number of non-filers revealed a dramatic rise from 22 lakhs in 2014 to a whopping 59 lakhs in 2016 (pre-demonetisation) and 67 lakhs at present.

What we need to know, is how many of the above 6.7 million ‘non-filers’ are now within the tax net? If CBDT anyway had zeroed in on several million potential tax evaders and almost a million high value transactions without PAN, then what additional data did they get out of demonetisation? The IT Department, as part of Operation Clean Money, launched post-demonetisation, has so far shot off 23.5 lakh notices to those persons, whose tax profiles are inconsistent with the cash deposits made by them during demonetisation period ( November 8 – December 31). It would be quite interesting to see how many of these 23 lakh persons are part of the 6.7 million non-filers club.

To shower all credit in the lap of demonetisation, for the rise in number of tax returns/ increase in tax collections, is at one level, undermining the conscious efforts of the CBDT and IT Department, to track and bring tax evaders into the tax net. Demonetisation may have been a powerful, painful nail in the coffin for many a tax evaders, but not the only nail. To use a cliché, the jury is well and truly still out.

Eco-friendly: Pollution levels gone down in Bhopal without fire cracker ban

October 20, 2017

The Supreme Court ban on fire crackers may not have had the desired impact on post Diwali pollution levels in Delhi and NCR but in Bhopal city residents appear to have taken the cue even without the stick falling on the Madhya Pradesh state capital.

According to the Diwali day data released by the state pollution control board, pollution levels in Bhopal have gone down in comparison to last level.

According to RR Singh Sengar of State Pollution Control Bureau, particulate matter of 10 micrometers or less (PM 10) in diameter has gone down.

"Till last year, we used to measure just PM 10 and that has gone down. This year, we also measured PM 2.5 and found that 75 per cent in PM 10 was PM 2.5 on Diwali day," Sengar said.

The Pollution Control Board did sampling at seven locations in Bhopal, out of which two were industrial areas, AKVN and Mandideep.

The pollution levels were observed to be within limits in both industrial areas. Last year, the Pollution Control Board had taken samples at three locations.

"The average pollution in Bhopal was within the prescribed limits and this was perhaps due to increased awareness amongst city residents," Sengar said.

The pollution levels went down even though state Home Minister, Bhoopendra Singh, had openly ridiculed Supreme Court for banning crackers. He also invited Delhiites to Madhya Pradesh to burst crackers on Diwali.

The government, on lines of the Union Environment Ministry's notification that banned high decibel crackers had banned manufacture, sale and use of crackers emitting noise levels exceeding 125 dB(A1) or 145 dB(C).

RSS General Secretary Bhaiyaa Ji Joshi, who was in Bhopal a day before Diwali too, had taken a dig at the cracker ban saying someone could raise similar objections to 'diyas' in the future.

Despite the Home Minister's invite to Delhiites, various campaigns for a green diwali were carried out by an active citizenry in Bhopal that seems to have clearly paid.

Seems like Delhiites really need to learn the art of being eco-friendly from Bhopal residents.

Amit Shah has cut short his programme, Skips Kerala Jan Raksha Yatra, BJP left red-faced

October 05, 2017


In a major setback to BJP’s ambitious Jan Raksha Yatra, which began in Kannur on Tuesday with a war cry against the CPM, party chief Amit Shah has cut short his programme. Shah was back in the national capital on Tuesday itself.


Although there is no official confirmation about his return to the state, party sources said Shah is unlikely to take part in the march (padyatra) on Thursday, which is scheduled to pass through Kerala Chief Minister Pinarayi Vijayan’s hometown.


Neither the BJP’s media cell nor the state unit leaders have given any reason for his absence from padyatra on Thursday. On Wednesday, the BJP president was expected to attend programmes in Mangalore, which, too, were cancelled.


While some state leaders said Shah’s programme has been cancelled, others said he might join the public meeting scheduled to take place in Thalassery in the evening.

Sources in the BJP described the curtailing of the trip as “rescheduling” and added that the party president will be present on the last day of the fortnight-long campaign on October 17, where he is scheduled to attend the concluding ceremony in Thiruvananthapuram.


Some state BJP leaders blamed it on “bad planning”, while some rumours cited Shah’s health as a reason for cutting short the programme — they said the party president should not have walked the entire stretch on Tuesday.


Shah walked nine kilometres on Tuesday, from Payyannur to Pilathara, where he addressed a public rally.


Shah’s decision to skip the padyatra would be a major embarrassment to its Kerala unit and its president Kummanam Rajasekharan who is leading it from Kannur to Thiruvananthapuram covering 11 of the state’s 14 districts. The padyatra, with the theme ‘All Have To Live: Against Jihadi-Red Terror’, is part of the campaign of the BJP and its ideological parent RSS to “expose the political violence against their workers in the state by the Communists”.


Significantly, Uttar Pradesh Chief Minister Yogi Adityanath also participated in the march on Wednesday, where he raised the issues of ‘love jihad’ and terrorism, which, the BJP claimed has been supported by the ruling Pinarayi Vijayan-led CPM government.


Meanwhile, Shah’s march has been ridiculed by Communist leaders in the state. On Thursday, the Malayalam mouthpiece of the CPM, Deshabhimani, carried stories of atrocities against Dalits, rapes and protests by farmers in BJP-ruled states and raised a question: “Is this BJP’s Janaraksha?”


Shah’s absence is likely to make the CPM camps upbeat with local party leaders claiming the BJP chief had left the battlefield ever before the war has begun.

High court rejects Zakia Jafri's petition against Narendra Modi, Upholds clean chit to Narendra Modi, others in 2002 riots case

October 05, 2017

In a setback for Zakia Jafri, the Gujarat High Court on Thursday upheld the closure report that gave a clean chit to Prime Minister Narendra Modi and 61 others in 2002 post-Godhra riots case. The court also dismissed Jafri’s allegation against the accused that the riots were part of a larger conspiracy.

The court, however, said that Jafri’s plea succeeds as far as her demand of fresh investigation was concerned before the magisterial court.

“The trial court has self-limited itself in saying that further investigation, in this case, can’t be ordered. This order of lower court deserves interference. So, the petitioner can raise the issue before the concerned court that is the same magisterial court, the division bench of the high court or the Supreme Court,” Justice Sonia Gokani said.

Justice Gokani while pronouncing the order said that the magisterial court, which first accepted the closure report, was wrong in its judgment that it didn’t have the power to order a fresh investigation. “The court doesn’t believe in the larger conspiracy theory propounded by the petitioners as the Supreme Court has monitored the investigation,” Justice Gokani said.

Zakia had moved the high court in 2014 against a closure report filed by the Supreme Court-appointed SIT on the issue of a larger criminal conspiracy involving Modi and others behind 2002 riots cases. Her husband Ahsan Jafri was one of the 69 victims of the riots as a mob had set their house in city’s Gulberg Society on fire.

The SIT had filed a closure report against Modi and other accused after an investigation. It said that there was not enough material to prosecute Modi and other accused. The SIT didn’t believe the testimony of former IPS officers Sanjiv Bhatt and RB Sreekumar among others. Besides, SIT also said in its investigation that the allegations were vague in nature and there was no concrete evidence against the accused.

‘Donald Trump ready for any step’ if Islamabad supports terror groups , Says Mattis

October 05, 2017


Washington: Mincing no words, US Defence Secretary James Mattis on Wednesday said President Donald Trump is prepared to take "whatever steps necessary" against Pakistan if it continued to extend support to terror groups.

Mattis further warned Pakistan of global "diplomatic isolation" and losing its non-NATO ally status, if it failed to take action against safe havens to terrorists, that are operating on its soil.

While addressing members of the powerful House Armed Services Committee during a Congressional testimony on South Asia and Afghanistan on Wednesday, Mattis said: "If our best efforts fail, President Trump is prepared to take whatever steps necessary."

He was asked a series of questions by Congressmen who expressed their frustration on Pakistan not taking actions against terror groups.

Without much elaboration, Mattis said the US has "enormously powerful number of options" if Pakistan does not follow through and be a better promoter of stability in the region.

"Right now, I would like to think we will be successful," Mattis said. "With the growing consensus against terrorism, they'll find themselves diplomatically isolated."

"There is an awful lot of advantage to Pakistan of coming online with the international community, and we have to stay focused there, but the penalties are just as significant as the advantages if they choose to go a different direction," he said.

"But for right now, the US needs to try one more time to make this strategy work with them by, with, and through the Pakistanis," he said.

When Congressman Rick Larsen asked if revocation of non-NATO allies status is on the list of possibilities against Pakistan, Mattis said, "I'm sure it will be."

Mattis' tough talk on Pakistan, came as Pakistan Foreign Minister Khwaja Asif is visiting the US as part of efforts to rebuild bilateral ties frayed after President Trump accused Islamabad of sheltering terror groups.

President Trump announced his Afghanistan and South Asia policy in August in which he adopted a tough policy against Pakistan.

In a meeting with the Secretary of State Rex Tillerson, Asif defended his country's role in the war against terrorism.

He claimed that Pakistan has pursued a zero-tolerance and indiscriminate approach in its campaign against all terrorist and militant groups.

However, Mattis told lawmakers that while the US is adopting "a whole of government approach" on Pakistan, it is also aligning NATO countries on this.
"What you're going to see is 39 nations all in the NATO campaign working together to lay out what it is we need Pakistan to do, he said.

"What we are doing right now is that we are aligning what Department of Treasury, Department of Defence, the Intelligence Committee, Department of State, say, this is what we must ask Pakistan to do to change its behaviour," he added.

The Trump administration, he said, is going to use a whole government international effort to align the benefits and the penalties if those things are not done.

"Pakistan has lost more troops in this fight against terrorism than nearly any country out there. And yet at the same time, as you know, there's been some parsing out where some terrorists have been allowed safe havens. We're out to change that behaviour and do it very firmly, Mattis asserted.

As part of this, Mattis said there would be an exchange of high-level visits between the two countries.

Mattis said he and the Secretary of State Rex Tillerson will soon visit Islamabad.

"We're not going to back off. It will start with assistant secretaries coming out of Washington and the National Security staff members going into Pakistan soon followed by the Secretary of State," he said.

"I will go in and we have (NATO) Secretary General Stoltenberg's very clear support for this in his advocacy as the Secretary General of NATO. So we're going to continue to build this up in an international way with a whole of US government argument for the Pakistanis to work in their own best interest and ours," Mattis said.

After holding talks with Asif, Tillerson yesterday said that the US is concerned over the future of the government in Pakistan and wants to ensure long-term stability in the country.

Inviting Tillerson to visit Islamabad to continue their talks, Asif said that a broad-based and structured framework for dialogue would best serve the two countries' mutual interests.

Delhi University professor charged for Facebook post allegedly insulting goddess Durga

September 24, 2017


A Delhi University (DU) assistant professor has been accused of insulting Hindu goddess Durga using obscene words in a Facebook post, which prompted a condemnation from the Akhil Bharatiya Vidyarthi Parishad (ABVP). A teacher's body filed the police complaint against Mr Kedar Kumar Mandal of Dayal Singh College in the national capital, Delhi.



Mr Mandal had posted the controversial Facebook update at 07:43 pm yesterday and later deleted it.



The National Democratic Teachers Front (NDTF), a BJP-affiliated teacher's body, filed a complaint today at the Lodhi Colony police station. Police said they have received a complaint but are yet to file an FIR.



Mr Mandal did not respond to messages and could not be reached on his phone for comments.


RSS-affiliated ABVP condemned the post and demanded immediate suspension of the professor.

"We demand his suspension and we request the student community to boycott his classes. Mandal has provoked sentiments during a festival time of Hindu - Navratri," ABVP's Dayal Singh College unit said in a statement.

"If allowed to continue as a teacher he will only spread hatred among students."

UP madrasas refuse to sing national anthem

August 15, 2017


Many madrasas across Uttar Pradesh defied on Tuesday a controversial state government diktat that asked staff and students at the Islamic educational institutions to sing the national anthem and videograph Independence Day celebrations.

In Kanpur, Meerut and Bareilly, three of the biggest madrasa centres in the state, students sang Saare Jahan Se Achha, a 20th century patriotic song penned by the poet Mohammad Iqbal and didn't record proceedings, saying they didn't want to give proof of their patriotism. (Live updates)
"Students hoisted the flag and celebrated the occasion with traditional fervour. The government order is an attempt to test our patriotism which is wrong," said Haji Mohd Saleeh, convener of the Sunni Ulema Council.

The controversy was sparked by a circular passed by the Yogi Adityanath government last week that asked the Islamic schools to hoist the Tricolour and sing the national anthem at 8 am. The order, which made photography and videography of the event mandatory, argued that visual proof would help the board in encouraging participants to better their performance in the future.

But many of the state's 16,000 madrasas didn't take the order well and many prominent clerics publicly opposed the order. UP has one of the highest proportions of Muslims in the country, nearly a fifth, and just 600 of the madrasas are government aided.

In Bareilly, students at the Manzar-e-Islam - the biggest Barelvi madrasa in the city - hoisted the Tricolour but didn't sing the national anthem. Instead, around 500 students gathered at the open prayer hall to sing 'Sare jahan se achha'. The madrasa authorities also refrained from videography. Mediapersons were not allowed to cover the main event, which lasted for over an hour.

"Traditionally, we do not sing the national anthem during Independence Day or Republic Day celebrations. We only followed convention this time," a senior cleric told HT on the condition of anonymity.

The decision to oppose the government order was taken by senior cleric Asjad Miyan, a descendant of 20th century Islamic religious leader Ahmed Raza Barelvi. Ahmed Raza's dargah (shrine) in Bareilly is the most revered religious site for members of Sunni Islam's Barelvi sect. It manages over a thousand madrasas.

Barelvi clerics justified their decision, alleging the national anthem was written in praise of George V, the then king of England. "Singing of the national anthem belittles the struggle of our freedom fighters. Thereby, it has been unanimously decided that such songs will not be sung on Independence Day," they said in a press release.

In Meerut, all madrasas organised Independence Day programme on their premises and hoisted the Tricolour. Teachers and Muslim clerics addressed the students on the sacrifices made by all communities, including Muslims, in India's freedom struggle.

Mufti Syed Ahmad of madarsa Noor-ul-Islam in old city said, "We cannot worship anyone else other than Allah."

In Kanpur too, orders to videograph the event or sing the national anthem weren't followed. Haji Mohd Saleeh said the students sang 'Saare jahan se Accha' to show their love towards their country. "For us it is also a national song," he said.

Rs 1.75 lakh crore under scrutiny post note ban

August 15, 2017


Vowing to continue the crackdown on black money, Prime Minister Narendra Modi today said that over Rs 1.75 lakh crore deposited in banks post note-ban and more than 18 lakh people with disproportionate income are under government scrutiny.

Addressing the nation from the ramparts of the Red Fort on the 71st Independence Day, he said: "Those who have looted the nation and looted the poor are not able to sleep peacefully today."
Demonetisation of old Rs 500 and Rs 1,000 notes last November, he said, helped bring over Rs 3 lakh crore of hereto unaccounted wealth into the banking system.

"This is not government research this is outside experts," he added.

Modi said that out of the money deposited in banks post note ban, over Rs 1.75 lakh crore is under scrutiny. "More than Rs 2 lakh crore black money has reached banks and now people depositing such money are being made to answer questions on their origin."

The move, he said, has checked generation of new black money.

"The result of this has been that this year, the new tax payers (filing returns) has more than doubled to 56 lakh. Last year this was 22 lakh. This is the result of fight against black money," he said.

Prime Minister, who rode to power in 2014 on promise to eliminate black money, said the crackdown on ill-gotten wealth will continue.

"More than 18 lakh people have been identified whose income is more than their declared wealth," he said. "And they have to answer questions on how they accumulated such wealth."

Of the 18 lakh, 4.5 lakh people have come out in open and are seeking to amend their "mistakes," he said, adding that one lakh had not paid income tax ever in past.

Recalling the steps taken by his government to unearth unaccounted and untaxed wealth, he said black money of over Rs 1.25 lakh crore has been detected in last three years which people were compelled to surrender.

Demonetisation, he said, was a step in that direction which achieved great success.

OVER 1.75 LAKH SHELL COMPANIES SHUT

The move forced "the black money which was hidden to be brought to mainstream. Our effort was to get money into banks and make it a part of formal economy and we have done it successfully", he said.

Modi said in a nation where closure of a couple of companies would lead to debates on destruction of economy, more than 1.75 lakh shell companies have been shut.

Black money holders hid their wealth behind the veils of shell companies, he said. "After data mining post demonetisation, we have found 3 lakh such companies which are only shell companies."
Shell companies are non-trading firms used as a vehicle for various financial manoeuvres to avoid paying taxes.

"You will be surprised to know that there are 400 shell companies operating from same address. There was no enquiry and all of it was going on in connivance (between tax evaders and officials). And for this, I embarked on a fight against black money and corruption," he said.

Note ban, he said, got money into banks, which are now lowering interest rates.

Common man is getting money. "Bank are lending to poor at lower interest rates. This is all working to boost the country's economy," he said.

Modi stressed on digital payments to move towards less cash economy saying there has been 34 per cent increase in digital payments in last one year.

In nearly an hour long speech, Modi said the implementation of Goods and Services Tax (GST), that subsumed over a dozen central and state levies to weave India into one market, has been smooth.

"GST has shown the spirit of cooperative federalism. The nation has come together to support GST and the role of technology has also helped," he said.

Removal of check posts after implementation of GST has cut time for transporting goods by 30 per cent, he said.

The Prime Minister said for his government, good governance is about speed and simplification of processes.

'FIGHT WILL CONTINUE'

"Our fight against corruption and black money will continue. We are working to bring transparency using technology," he said. "We are fighting corruption - for the bright future of India and the well being of our people."

People responsible for "loot" of national wealth will have to give answers, he said. "Our fight against corruption and black money will continue."

Modi said changing demand and technology is altering the nature of job and his government wants to nurture youngsters to be job creators and not job seekers.

"We are taking the nation on a new track (of development) and are moving ahead with speed," he said, adding that the government was devoting significant attention to eastern states of Bihar, Assam, West Bengal, Odisha and Northeast.

"These parts have to grow further," he said.

Modi said he wants to create an India where poor have a concrete house, electricity and water. "An India where farmer does not have any worry and sleeps peacefully. An India where farmer gets double of what he sows."

Emotional Yogi Adityanath says none can be more sensitive towards children than me

August 13, 2017


With the number of children deaths at the BRD Hospital in Gorakhpur reaching 68, Uttar Pradesh Chief Minister Yogi Adityanath today got emotional and said that no one can be more sensitive towards children than him.

Yogi Adityanath and Union Health Minister J P Nadda today visited the BRD Hospital where several children have died allegedly due to suffocation caused by shortage of oxygen supply in wards.

"My fight against encephalitis is from 1996. I have seen children dying. I will not allow it to happen anymore," the Uttar Pradesh Chief Minister said, while addressing a press conference.

Calling today's visit his fourth to the hospital in recent times, Yodi Adityanath said that more than 90 lakh children have been vaccinated for encephalitis.

Promising strict against against the guilty, he said, "Let the probe committee's report come. If anyone's negligence caused the deaths, he will not be spared".

Yogi Adityanath also hit at those who he said were "trying to add salt to the wound by raising the sensitive issue unnecessarily".

He said that Prime Minister Narendra Modi personally called him up and assured him of Centre's assistance in the case, if needed. "He sent Union Health Minister J P Nadda here," Yogi Adityanath said.

Taking a dig at the Opposition, which has attacked Yogi Adityanath for the deaths, the Uttar Pradesh Chief Minister said, "When Ghulam Nabi Azad was the Union Health Minister, he came here and said that we can't do anything as it's a state matter".

In the wake of extensive reporting on the children deaths in the hospital, the Uttar Pradesh Chief Minister also asked mediapersons to visit the wards and see the real picture.

Independence Day 2017 "will not be celebrated" specified way in Bengal schools : Mamata Government

August 12, 2017


The Mamata Banerjee-led Bengal administration has got into a direct confrontation with the centre over Independence Day celebrations scheduled for next week.

Amidst the raging controversy over BJP ruled Uttar Pradesh government's diktat making it compulsory for Madrasa students to sing the national song "Vande Mataram" on I-day, the Bengal government has decided to suspend all such school programmes on that day.



Issuing an "urgent" directive to all District Project Officers in-charge of the Sarva Shikha Mission in the state, the Bengal government has asked schools to "stop all preparations for celebrating Independence Day 2017" in accordance with the specifications mentioned by the union Ministry of Human Resource & Development (MHRD).

The MHRD school education department had earlier issued a circular on July 25 to education secretaries of all states had specified "additional activities" to be undertaken by schools under the Sarva Shiksha Mission to celebrate Independence Day in a "befitting manner".



According to the circular, schools were requested to organise nine prescribed activities between August 8 and 15th with an objective to "create festive and patriotic mood across the nation". These include quiz and debate competitions on the theme of India's freedom struggle, patriotic slogan writing competitions, organizing Prabhat Pheris and marches, film screenings showcasing India's progress and taking unity and Swachhta pledges.

However, taking exception to the centre's circular, the Bengal school education department issued the notice on Friday, barely 72 hours before 15th August stating that Independence Day 2017 "will not be celebrated" in the manner specified by the Modi government.

Another court petition challenges Taj Mahal's story

August 12, 2017


Besides being on the top of the world's 'Wonders List', the Taj Mahal also ranks high on the list of monuments connected to controversies. Apart from being the primary cause of the industrial denudation of its host city Agra, the Taj Mahal is also at the centre of a debate over its alleged origin as a Hindu temple.

Although the higher courts, including the UP High Court and the Supreme Court, have refused to entertain any litigation over the monument's history, there is no dearth of cases being filed in the lower courts by religious zealots, demanding that the Taj Mahal be declared a Hindu temple.

Following the dismissal of a petition demanding that the Taj Mahal be declared 'Tejo Mahalay', based on the half-baked theories postulated by P N Oak in his book published almost four decades back, another case has now been filed in the Agra district court by a group of lawyers, who claim that the Taj Mahal is actually 'Agreshwar Mahadev' temple and have petitioned the court to declare the Mughal-era tomb as a temple.

THEORIES ABOUT TAJ MAHAL'S ORIGIN

In 2015 too, a group of 6 lawyers had petitioned the Agra district court on the same issue, based on the 'evidence' given by P N Oak in his book 'True Story of The Taj'. They had demanded that the basement of the Taj Mahal be opened and all rooms be searched for the evidence of Taj Mahal's Hindu origin. BJP MP Subramanian Swami had also made a similar demand.

However, historians have raised their doubts on P N Oak's theory which claims that the Taj Mahal has a large number of architectural points of Hindu origin. Prof. Sugam Anand, who heads the history department of Dr. B R Ambedkar University, Agra, said that it is a fact that the land on which the Taj Mahal now stands, belonged to Raja Jai Singh, who surrendered it to Emperor Shahjahan on his demand and accepted a 'Jagir' a few kilometres away in lieu of the land. Before the Taj Mahal was built on this land, it was a palace of Raja Jai Singh and there could have been a Shiva temple in the palace premises.

However, to claim that the Taj Mahal itself was a temple and was modified by Shahjahan to inter his wife Mumtaz in it, is doubt worthy, as there is no historical evidence that points in this direction. Whereas there is ample historical evidence that documents the construction of the Taj Mahal on this spot, he said.

A similar theory was postulated by historian Dr. Tarun Sharma who said that it was customary for Hindu kings to build temples inside their palaces which were surrounded by a garden. So there is a possibility that there was a Shiva temple in the palace that was acquired by Shahjahan to build the Taj Mahal and if the Taj Mahal was indeed a temple, the opening of the basement rooms could throw some light on this.

SHIVA STATUES AT TAJ MAHAL

There are some claims that Shiva statues had been seen inside the Taj by a visitor in 1934 and three statues were seen in the basement in 1962, however, there is no tangible evidence to this. Although it remains a fact that the basement rooms of the Taj Mahal were sealed by the ASI after the publication of P N Oak's book, which had incidentally been banned by the then Central government. Stephen Knepp, another historian, has also posted some pictures online that point towards the Hindu origins of Taj Mahal's architecture.

Commenting on the controversy, Agra Tourist Welfare Chamber Secretary Vishal Sharma said that whether the Taj Mahal was a temple or a tomb is a moot point now, as the world knows it as the tomb of the Empress of India Mumtaz Mahal. Besides, the evidence that is being cited to claim that the Taj Mahal was a temple in the past, is circumstantial at best, since it only points out at the 'Hindu-like' design elements of the Taj Mahal, not allowing for the fact that the Mughal architecture was actually a fusion of Indo-Persian architectural forms that incorporated a number of local elements. This is evident in the architecture of Humayun's tomb in Delhi, which has been constructed in a similar fashion as the Taj, although it predates the Taj Mahal by a good 50 years.

'Fatwa' issued against Muslim minister in Bihar for chanting 'Jai Shri Ram'

July 30, 2017


A Muslim cleric on Sunday issued a "fatwa" against newly appointed Bihar minister and Janata Dal (United) leader Khurshid alias Firoz Ahmad for chanting Jai Shri Ram, saying his marriage would be terminated for his "mistake".

An MLA from Sikta in West Champaran, Ahmad shouted the slogan, normally associated with BJP supporters, outside the Bihar assembly on Friday after chief minister Nitish Kumar won the trust vote he faced after breaking ties with the RJD-Congress alliance and joining hands with the BJP.

The fatwa, or a decree, against the only Muslim minister in Kumar's new cabinet was issued by Mufti Sohail Quasmi of Imarat Shariah, which describes itself as a socio-religious organisation active in Bihar, Jharkhand and Odisha.

"Islam teaches respect for all religions. If by saying Jai Shri Ram I can do some good for the Muslims, why is there such a hue and cry," Ahmad, who has been given charge of minority welfare and sugarcane industries, told mediapersons.

He would not be cowed down by such threats, he said.

The minister later apologised for his statement, while talking to a TV channel.

"The CM told me if anybody felt hurt by my statement, I should apologise. My intention was not to hurt anyone. I have come to serve the people. My statement was distorted," he told the channel after coming out of a review meeting of the minority welfare department with chief minister Nitish Kumar.

However, his phone was switched off when HT tried to contact him

Upset over the slogan hailing Hindu god Ram, Quasmi said Ahmad's marriage would be terminated and he would have to perform the nikah again after accepting his "mistake".

Imarat Shariah general secretary Anisurrehman said the organisation had not issued a fatwa but it could be a personal opinion of Quasmi.

"I have not talked to him. I will try to find out what made him speak like this," he said.

HT tried to reach Quasmi for comments but his phone was switched off.

"A Muslim is honest to his conscience. What wrong have I done? I have not divorced my wife. I don't know how the fatwa was issued and for what," said the minister.

The BJP came out in his defence. "Any fatwa on such issues is against the spirit and rich tradition of India, which has always epitomised diversity and respect for each other's religion," Bihar BJP spokesman Azfar Shamshi said.

Ahmad had taken forward the Indian tradition while the fatwa was against it. "The days are gone when Muslims were waylaid on sentimental issues. Now, they want solutions to their core issues," he said.

Maryada Purushottam Ram was known as Imam-e-Hind (an ideal person), he said, adding Indonesia, which has the world's highest number of Muslims, had named its national carrier named Garuda while several building were named Ramayan.

In Hindu mythology, Garuda is the mount of Lord Vishnu. Ram is an incarnation of Vishnu.

"It is the spirit of Ram that is important and there is no need to fan sentiments," Shamshi said.

India has always been as a country of Ram and Raheem and there should not be any effort to create a divide, JD-U spokesman Neeraj Kumar said.

"Gandhi ji talked of Ram and Raheem in the same breath. Former president APJ Abdul Kalam observed both Ramazan and Navratra. Ahmad has just reflected the 'Ganga-Jamuni tehzeeb of the country," he said.

As part of the so-called grand alliance, Nitish Kumar had worked hard to woo the Muslim community and his decision to join hands with the BJP is unlikely to go down well it.

His decision to go with the RJD and the Congress to oppose the "communal agenda" of the BJP saw the minority community support him in 2015 state election. Kumar had betrayed people of Bihar and joined hands with communal forces, his former allies have said.

Amit Shah concludes 3-day Rajasthan visit, has lunch at Dalit family's house

July 23, 2017


Jaipur: BJP president Amit Shah on Sunday had lunch with a Dalit family in Jaipur on the last day of his three-day visit to Rajasthan.

After rounds of meeting in the party office, Shah left for Sushilpura where he had lunch at the house of BJP Yuva Morcha member Ramesh Pacharia amid tight security arrangements.

Shah, accompanied by Chief Minister Vasundhara Raje, party's state president Ashok Parnami, MP Bhupendra Yadav and others, was given a warm welcome in traditional Rajasthani manner.

They were served food by Pacharia's family and had lunch sitting on the ground. "My mother cooked daal, rice, chapatti, halwa, kheer for the party president," Pacharia told reporters.

Before Shah's visit, party leaders made several rounds to review preparations.

Social justice minister Arun Chaturvedi said the party selected the house of its booth level worker, Pacharia, based on his active work for the party and not due to his caste or class.

"We identify our workers on the basis of their work. We do not consider their caste or class and decision for Shah's lunch at his house was made just because of his active participation in the party's work," he said.

The minister said that it is the media, not the party, which sees the caste and Dalit factor.

"For us, his work is considerable and we sees it as the party's national president has gone to the house of a booth level work to have lunch," he said.

"It is not that we selected a Dalit family. Several Dalit families live close the BJP office but the party president came at the house of an active party worker. The distance of Sushilpura is also not very far from the party office," he said.

The narrow lanes of Sushilpura are populated by lower middle class and Dalit families. It is located in the middle of the city and witnessed VVIP movement for the first time.

Excited people lined up on roads and congregated on rooftops to catch a glimpse of Shah.

Shah spent close to half an hour at the house of Pacharia and interacted with the family members. He met the locals outside the house and waved to those standing on rooftops.

Police Commissioner Sanjay Agrawal reviewed the sercurity arrangements for the visit.

Union minister Rajyawardhan Rathore, MP Bhupendra Yadav, Nihal Chand Meghwal, state social justice minister Arun Chaturvedi and other leaders were present with him.

Assembly elections are due next year in Rajasthan.

Fake News: Syed Salahuddin Wasn't Offered Congress Ticket in 1987

June 30, 2017


Interest in Hizbul Mujahideen chief Syed Salahuddin's name spiked after the US government designated him a "global terrorist", just ahead of the meet between Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi and US President Donald Trump last week.

A native of the Budgam district in Jammu and Kashmir, Salahuddin was known as an Islamic scholar and preacher. He was also associated with socio-political organisation, Jamaat-e-Islami.

A website Postcard.news reported "shocking information" that Salahuddin was offered a Congress ticket to contest from Amira Kadal constituency for state elections in 1987.

In the article, postcard.news wrote:

Congress had given him MLA ticket from Amira Kadal constituency in Budgam despite knowing his extreme hatred towards India and his pro-Pakistan stand.

They added that the Congress had to backtrack on the decision because National Conference wanted to field their candidate Ghulam Mohiuddin Shah, after which Congress withdrew his candidature. The article quoted Dainik Bhaskar.

The gist of this was picked up by a Twitter user whose tweet got over 1,700 retweets and 1,200 likes.

Tweeting the News

Handles like @DrGPradhan, which have more than 84,000 followers, also tweeted out this fake news.
A number of other handles too fell for the misinformation.



Not So Fast

As pointed out by SMHoaxSalyer , Dainik Bhaskar has been falsely quoted by Postcard.
Here is what Dainik Bhaskar actually reported.

Dainik Bhaskar, in their article, only said that Salahuddin contested elections in 1987 on a Muslim United Front ticket.

The "shocking news" of how he contested in MUF ticket because NC wanted to field their candidate was not reported by Dainik Bhaskar, but was quoted so by the Postcard, reported SMHoaxSlayer.

Not just Dainik Bhaskar, even Hindustan Times reported that he contested on an MUF ticket and there is no mention of Salahuddin being offered a Congress ticket.

Salahuddin eventually lost the election to NC's Ghulam Mohiuddin Shah but the loss was marred by allegation of rigging elections against the Congress-NC alliance, reported the Hindustan Times.

Not for separate Gorkhaland state, BJP clarifies

June 27, 2017


The BJP on Tuesday said that it does not support its ally Gorkha Janmukti Morcha's demand for a separate state comprising Darjeeling and parts of north Bengal but called for addressing the region's cultural and political concerns.

Its chief Amit Shah, who arrived here following a two-day tour of Puducherry, met party leaders, including general secretary and Bengal in-charge Kailash Vijayvargiya.

A BJP leader, however, played down the meeting's import, saying Shah routinely meets party leaders and it should not be linked with the issue.

Earlier in the day, Vijayvargiya told reporters that his party does not support the demand of a separate state and blamed the state's Mamata Banerjee government for triggering a crisis by undermining the Gorkha Territorial Administration. He said the cultural and political concerns of the people in the region needed to be addressed and the BJP was for empowering the GTA and taking other measures.

Party sources said a separate state of Gorkhaland, as is the GTA's demand, would create security concerns due to its location, it shares borders with Nepal, and would be economically unfeasible too.

They said a delegation could meet Home Minister Rajnath Singh, asking him to take measures to address the concerns of the people in the region.

Sikkim tourism benefiting from Darjeeling unrest

June 20, 2017

Gangtok, Jun 20: The unrest in Darjeeling in the peak tourist season has come as a boon for Sikkim with tourists thronging the neighbouring hill state instead of Darjeeling in view of the Gorkha Janmukti Morcha agitation.

'The tension in Darjeeling has led to a sudden boom in the tourism industry here,' Secretary, Sikkim Tourism, C Zangpo said.

The GJM agitation in Darjeeling led to the cancellation of bookings by domestic and foreign tourists in the 'Queen of hill stations' and make travel arrangements in Sikkim, he said.

'Tourism related establishments in Gangtok are currently packed with customers and have full bookings in the coming days as well,' Zangpo states.

The Sikkim Tourism secretary said that almost all the tourists who are now visiting Sikkim were supposed to visit Darjeeling on the second leg of their journey or had been there before reaching Sikkim. Travel operators, however, are worried as it is difficult to manage so many tourists at a time, and the secretary also echoed similar views.

'We have asked travel operators and hotels to try and accommodate as many tourists as they can without compromising on the service standards as any mismanagement at this time could give a bad name to the tourism industry,' Zangpo said.

Hotels presently have bookings upto mid-July and they have now started cancelling new booking enquiries, one of the travel operators said. Santanu Bose, a tourist from Kolkata, said, 'We had been in Darjeeling for holidaying when all this happened. Our travel agent immediately contacted operators in Sikkim and we were lucky to get reservations.'

Many tourists, however, had to cut short their visit and return, Bose told PTI at the Mall here.

'We spent only one night in Darjeeling. We are enjoying our stay here now,' he said.

As the tourists from Sikkim were now being provided Sikkim Nationalised Transport buses every day with security, they are feeling secure that they will not get stuck in the hills because of the ongoing bandh.

Since June 8, Darjeeling has witnessed clashes between GJM activists and police over the demand for a separate Gorkhaland state. Sikkim government sources they had requested their West Bengal counterpart on Sunday to provide security to vehicles passing through NH 31A in Darjeeling district in view of the agitation.

The West Bengal government had assured them that security would be provided to Sikkim-bound vehicles and the police would carry out extensive patrolling on the highway. The 92 km long NH 31A connects Sevoke in Darjeeling district to Gangtok and is considered the lifeline of Sikkim. Around 30 km of the highway passes through West Bengal.

Bihar won't participate in International Yoga Day 'publicity stunt': Nitish Kumar

June 20, 2017

Bihar Chief Minister Nitish Kumar on Monday took a dig at the Prime Minister Narendra Modi-led National Democratic Alliance (NDA) Government over the International Yoga Day (IYD) preparations and termed the government's efforts in this regard a 'publicity stunt'.

Making these remarks while addressing a press conference here, Nitish said he was not against yoga but did not approve of such publicity stunts.

"I am not against yoga day but I don't like publicity stunts on this (IYD). I also do yoga but have never advertised it," said Nitish.

He also announced that the Bihar Government won't participate in IYD by saying "we don't believe in advertisement".

Nitish shares sweet and sour relations with Prime Minister Modi, as the political tussle between the two leaders is not new.

Nitish's party Janata Dal (United) was an important ally of the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) led NDA for almost two decades.

For the first time, the rift between the two leaders came to fore when Nitish reportedly insisted the BJP top brass to keep then Gujarat Chief Minister Narendra Modi out of campaigning in 2005 Bihar assembly elections after the United Progressive Alliance (UPA) performed very well in Bihar in 2004 General Elections.

Reports said that Nitish was against the Gujarat Chief Minister's campaigning in Bihar over the 2002 Gujarat riots and believed his campaigning would keep Muslims voters away from the NDA.
The Bihar Chief Minister's distance from then Gujarat Chief Minister Narendra Modi continued during 2010 Bihar Assembly elections as well as the 2009 General elections.However, probably Nitish Kumar was the only opposition leader who openly supported Prime Minister Modi's decision of the demonetisation.

Modi Government has made grand plans for the forthcoming International Yoga Day.
The Ministry of Ayurveda, Yoga and Naturopathy, Unani, Siddha and Homoeopathy (AYUSH) has been working tirelessly to make the International Yoga Day functions across the country and world a grand success.

Union government's 74 ministers would take part in Yoga Day functions in 74 cities on June 21.
Prime Minister Modi would take part in Yoga day function in Uttar Pradesh's capital Lucknow where AYUSH Minister Shripad Naik would also be present.

AYUSH Ministry is working day and night to make the International Yoga Day a big success not only at national level but also at international level. It has written letters to different Ambassadors and Embassies and urged to make the event successful.

International Yoga Day is celebrated annually on 21 June since its inception in 2015. Prime Minister Narendra Modi in his UN address had suggested the date of 21 June, as it is the longest day of the year in the Northern Hemisphere and shares special significance in many parts of the world.

Next President of India could be named today: BJP meet at 12

June 19, 2017


The consultation process to elect the next President of India is over and the BJP is all set to announce its candidate. The BJP's Parliamentary board will meet today at 12 noon following which the name of the candidate will be made known.

The BJP's national president, Amit Shah has arrived for the meet. The Prime Minister would meet with his core team to pick the NDA's candidate. The meeting would be attended by Sushma Swaraj, Venkaiah Naidu, Rajnath Singh, Arun Jaitley and Nitin Gadkari.

We have consulted allies and opposition parties in detail. The parliamentary board will now consider possible nominees and announce a decision in the next couple of days,' Union urban development minister Venkaiah Naidu said on Sunday.

Meanwhile West Bengal Chief Minister, Mamata Banerjee suggested that either Pranab Mukherjee be renominated or a senior politician be the candidate. Even after meeting SP patriarch Mulayam Singh Yadav, Naidu's outreach to leaders close to former UP CM Akhilesh Yadav showed that NDA was not taking any chances.

The BJP's national president also met with Shiv Sena chief Uddhav Thackerey and held consultations on the candidate. The Shiv Sena has been demanding that RSS chief Mohan Bhagwat be made the next President of India. The party also recommended the name of M S Swaminathan for the post.
 
Copyright © Today Voices. Designed by JANA